From owner-freebsd-alpha Wed Apr 4 12:12:31 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from quark.ele.etsmtl.ca (quark.ele.etsmtl.ca [142.137.17.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3201A37B71A for ; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 12:12:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nospam@ele.etsmtl.ca) Received: from station1.ele.etsmtl.ca (station1 [142.137.19.101]) by quark.ele.etsmtl.ca (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA27140 for ; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 15:12:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ele.etsmtl.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by station1.ele.etsmtl.ca (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA01681 for ; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 15:12:22 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3ACB7215.F40BE906@ele.etsmtl.ca> Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2001 15:12:21 -0400 From: Normand Leclerc Reply-To: lecn1306@ele.etsmtl.ca X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; SunOS 5.7 sun4u) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Vinum status Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org There has been a nice debate on dev_t structure related to vinum. I need vinum working. I'd like to have a status on it please. Is it working in the -stable branch (4.3 BETA RC2 as of today) or is it still bugged? Normand Leclerc lecn1306@ele.etsmtl.ca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message