From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Dec 6 16:45:54 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id QAA21061 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 6 Dec 1996 16:45:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from rocky.mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id QAA21056 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 1996 16:45:52 -0800 (PST) Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.mt.sri.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id RAA23269; Fri, 6 Dec 1996 17:45:41 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 6 Dec 1996 17:45:41 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <199612070045.RAA23269@rocky.mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams To: Chuck Robey Cc: Terry Lambert , Archie Cobbs , hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Yacc -p is broken In-Reply-To: References: <199612062301.QAA24585@phaeton.artisoft.com> Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > I'm using yacc instead of bison because of the GPL. The yacc/bison > > grammar->code reduction includes code distributed with the tool. For > > bison, this code is GPL'ed. For yacc, it is not. I don't want the > > resulting code to be GPL restricted about how I can use it, therefore > > I use yacc. > > Terry, I will be the first to admit I'm no lawyer, but I thought that the > output from bison was not in itself GPL'ed, just the bison code > itself. Actually, until recently the output from bison was GPL'd, but they changed it b/c nobody was using bison or somesuch. Nate