From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 10 12:11:37 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8A3C37B404 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 12:11:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thalia.otenet.gr (thalia.otenet.gr [195.170.0.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 783B443FA3 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 12:11:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from gothmog.gr (patr530-b196.otenet.gr [212.205.244.204]) by thalia.otenet.gr (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h3AJBS72026792; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 22:11:33 +0300 (EEST) Received: from gothmog.gr (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.gr (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h3AJBPKD011246; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 22:11:25 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.gr (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h3AJBPCO011245; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 22:11:25 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 22:11:25 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Bruce Evans Message-ID: <20030410191124.GA5029@gothmog.gr> References: <20030410222414.C1200@gamplex.bde.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030410222414.C1200@gamplex.bde.org> cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: input handling broken in gdb X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 19:11:38 -0000 On 2003-04-10 22:28, Bruce Evans wrote: > gdb now mishandles stdin: > > %%% > Script started on Thu Apr 10 22:23:30 2003 > ttyv1:root@gamplex:/tmp> echo "p hz" | gdb -k /kernel /dev/mem > (kgdb) Hangup detected on fd 0 > error detected on stdin > ttyv1:root@gamplex:/tmp> exit > > Script done on Thu Apr 10 22:23:43 2003 > %%% > > This is with my version of an uncurrent version of -current. Does -current > have the same bug? Yes. I have just repeated this with today's current.