From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun 10 04:09:11 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF7F37B401
	for <chat@freebsd.org>; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 04:09:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hannibal.servitor.co.uk (hannibal.servitor.co.uk
	[195.188.15.48])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CB7C43F75
	for <chat@freebsd.org>; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 04:09:10 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from paul@hannibal.servitor.co.uk)
Received: from paul by hannibal.servitor.co.uk with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 19Pgzx-000NOI-Oi; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 12:09:05 +0100
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 12:09:05 +0100
From: Paul Robinson <paul@iconoplex.co.uk>
To: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@nitro.dk>
Message-ID: <20030610110905.GG30092@iconoplex.co.uk>
References: <20030606125417.A3489@online.fr>
	<20030609110705.GC34980@iconoplex.co.uk> <20030609182157.GC405@nitro.dk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In-Reply-To: <20030609182157.GC405@nitro.dk>
Sender: Paul Robinson <paul@hannibal.servitor.co.uk>
cc: Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@online.fr>
cc: chat@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Peeve: why "i386"?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Non technical items related to the community
	<freebsd-chat.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat>,
	<mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-chat>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat>,
	<mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 11:09:11 -0000

On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 08:21:58PM +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:

> But PC-98 is not just another name for i386, it actually has some
> differences to standard i386.

In the context of this discussion, they're the same. That's the point.

--=20
Paul Robinson