From owner-cvs-all Fri Aug 11 11:38: 8 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 456AC37B8D7; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 11:37:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA09572; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 12:37:55 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id MAA36232; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 12:37:25 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200008111837.MAA36232@harmony.village.org> To: "Chris D. Faulhaber" Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/perl Makefile Cc: Christopher Masto , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 11 Aug 2000 14:29:37 EDT." References: Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 12:37:25 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- In message "Chris D. Faulhaber" writes: : Any reason against it? Given the security hole found under Linux and : potential problems of Yet Another Suid Binary, it seems a good : idea. Also, see the recent discussions on FreeBSD-security. I'd also like to point out that the entire FreeBSD Security team supported this. Generally, only one or two of the 5 member team speak out on any issues. This time we had all 5 of them saying "kill it." Warner -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3ia Charset: noconv Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface iQCVAwUBOZRH49xynu/2qPVhAQG+RQP/T7HGgogqvFiL3zdA7zmkBxztYV22NpMm Bu0b7z3la4NuALCESaPWqv/kM7S0pkT/arMwmVBetGiLzImgHcyhD1Ih0gd3uK9D gqAWfjM4bbze5HODawMQz3L4m6TuLa3ino4yOl+G45nY/MqwFJNY7/4NFHqex9rv EgyVq1RKV8E= =9E+r -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message