Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 18:27:59 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 272777] [NEW PORT] www/dasherr: Lightweight dashboard for self-hosted services (and bookmarks) Message-ID: <bug-272777-7788-H1REdjl8vf@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-272777-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-272777-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D272777 --- Comment #3 from Jes=C3=BAs Daniel Colmenares Oviedo <DtxdF@disroot.org>= --- (In reply to Robert Clausecker from comment #1) Hi Robert, thank you for review this port. > - please set LICENSE_FILE It is not included in the distfile, but since it is a known license I have = not put LICENSE_FILE. > - why do the files need to be owned by www? This means the webserver wi= ll be able to write them, which is usually a bad thing As in any other port I use www as generic user, all those projects usually = need a web server like NGINX or apache that by default run as www user. If the u= ser needs to modify this parameter, a chown will adapt to his needs. ``` # grep -e'@owner www' -e'@group www' www/*/pkg-plist | wc -l 45 ``` Some, like WordPress, generate the pkg-plist file dynamically but use www in the same way. Of course, I listen to any other recommendations, but I think www is fine. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-272777-7788-H1REdjl8vf>