Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:12:21 +0100 From: "Heiko Wundram (Beenic)" <wundram@beenic.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 32 bit FreeBSD compiled binary coredumps on 64 bit(amd) FreeBSD Message-ID: <200802200912.21515.wundram@beenic.net> In-Reply-To: <1563a4fd0802192217v2776fd50hf299ee7d86d9fb5c@mail.gmail.com> References: <1563a4fd0802192217v2776fd50hf299ee7d86d9fb5c@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am Mittwoch, 20. Februar 2008 07:17:30 schrieb navneet Upadhyay:
> I am compiling the binary on 32 bit FreeBSD and running it on 64
> (amd64)bit FreeBSD . FreeBSD says it is possible to do so.
> But my application core dumps . I investigated the reason which is
> as follows :
>
> The problem is in the call retval = sysctl(mib, 4, &kp, &sz, NULL, 0);
> where sz is size of kp and where kp is a structure of type kinfo_proc. The
> size of this structure on 32bit system is 768 and on 64 bit system is 1088.
>
> The call works on 32 bit system but when run on 64 bit system it coredumps
> , because of the size mismatch of kinfo_proc .
>
> If i hardcode the sz to 1088 then it works on amd64 systems , how do i deal
> with it. I am anticipating lot of coredumps like that, what is a generic
> solution for such kinds of problems.
Without investigating further whether the structure up to byte 768 is
different (wrt. structure member offsets, and thus wrt. to hardcoded
constants in the binary file), which would be a real showstopper for the
i386"-emulation" on amd64 (and thus I can't see it being that way), see the
documentation of sysctl:
RETURN VALUES
Upon successful completion, the value 0 is returned; otherwise the
value -1 is returned and the global variable errno is set to indicate the
error.
ERRORS
[ENOMEM] The length pointed to by oldlenp is too short to hold
the requested value.
So, basically, you should check in the call whether sysctl returned -1 (with
errno set to ENOMEM), and enlarge the buffer if so, until it doesn't
return -1 anymore. This should handle i386 and amd64 transparently (if the
offsets up to byte 768 are equal/similar).
In case you're trying to recompile the application on 64-bit, you should use
sizeof() anyway to automatically adapt the initial buffer size reserved for
the output buffer depending on the definition of the structure (which will
also spare you pain if a FreeBSD upgrade changes the structure).
--
Heiko Wundram
Product & Application Development
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200802200912.21515.wundram>