From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 6 14:44:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DCB9106568B for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2011 14:44:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from oproxy4-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy4-pub.bluehost.com [69.89.21.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB0808FC1B for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2011 14:44:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29549 invoked by uid 0); 6 Aug 2011 14:44:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by cpoproxy1.bluehost.com with SMTP; 6 Aug 2011 14:44:03 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apotheon.com; s=default; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date; bh=LdC92aJghADwmMMHj2R9D53UXkE7SpaEJmL22SUHz0s=; b=iA+I2jQ2d5vgpFkN9zoOocgle4UVXH8V8ExW4FDAapAvWbNUfK9Rved7c/oPEtvh5Tl7HsfxcxMUCpNLlOoj+zh8Y+0CuavTq2qQqtIyhydBRVyeTZ2q298WBG2y3i4I; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kukaburra.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Qpi6c-00031a-7A for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2011 08:44:03 -0600 Received: by kukaburra.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 06 Aug 2011 08:26:39 -0600 Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2011 08:26:39 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110806142639.GB48611@guilt.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20110805191214.GA19848@kar.user-mode.org> <20110805190825.d2cf7f06.rodperson@rodperson.com> <20110806015652.GB45455@guilt.hydra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jho1yZJdad60DJr+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: Alternative windowmanagers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2011 14:44:04 -0000 --jho1yZJdad60DJr+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 09:20:08PM -0600, Dmitri Brengauz wrote: > On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Chad Perrin wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 07:08:25PM -0400, Rod Person wrote: > > > > > > If you like Fluxbox you might want to try OpenBox. > > > > Nah. Stick with Fluxbox. > > Sorry, but why? I went with OpenBox, because it seemed like it was under > current development, and Fluxbox is stagnant, otherwise, I didn't see much > difference. But I do find it curious that so many on this thread are > recommending Fluxbox, and almost no one OpenBox. What would be the reaso= n? Fluxbox supports window tabbing. Last I checked, OpenBox did not. In fact, amongst the 'box window managers, window tabbing is pretty much the killer feature. That, and it has a better license than OpenBox. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --jho1yZJdad60DJr+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk49Tx8ACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKUcFgCguaOLbAM8ig62w4Tjyxi2ZhL+ VSYAn290CzXgJkyo4D/BC50Cs3Jowq4G =7tGs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jho1yZJdad60DJr+--