Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 09:07:55 +0000 From: myfreeweb <greg@unrelenting.technology> To: Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Toolchain <freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: /usr/lib/libomp.so : is there a reason that aarch64 does not have such by default? Message-ID: <90091F80-717F-4405-952B-B6B955AE6E1F@unrelenting.technology> In-Reply-To: <2E4E8340-E4C1-4ED4-9E3D-F249D85D10FF@yahoo.com> References: <2E4E8340-E4C1-4ED4-9E3D-F249D85D10FF.ref@yahoo.com> <2E4E8340-E4C1-4ED4-9E3D-F249D85D10FF@yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On August 21, 2020 6:52:23 PM UTC, Mark Millard via freebsd-arm <freebsd-a= rm@freebsd=2Eorg> wrote: >My context: head ( currently at -r363590 ) > >man src=2Econf is explicit that WITHOUT_OPENMP is the default for >aarch64 (for example)=2E [=2E=2E=2E] >Nothing stands out for why WITH_OPENMP is in use by default only >for amd64, i386, and powerpc64=2E Because nobody has bothered to merge https://reviews=2Efreebsd=2Eorg/D2116= 7
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?90091F80-717F-4405-952B-B6B955AE6E1F>