From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun 30 14:13:39 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F629D93
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:13:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wg0-x234.google.com (mail-wg0-x234.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::234])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C12D92BDE
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:13:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id b13so8159579wgh.23
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 07:13:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type; bh=wD0aWvubhbTrFJCE/qeYnlyrU3uaAzhRHNbvB9W1NWo=;
 b=GBNEZMQc7um7NyxMoVneMyLYxeqWhsgTiwq6xQRwAKIsVly5I4VR25331Dw9QzCOcy
 4ugc8rA2XGm8vEec+qSE3NGdiJnDgiz08jRejW+irlYFfKYWCaKPo6R/ZDSQ8O/3cG6N
 UOZydAqlEBcwSPlQ/TiQljFxdBkAMB48Og9Eu7fh2X2FE+8brRXPMX3GJ49HhNXbjjfQ
 bzb3TR76F8QBaLPTSrylfm+QksD2QCTRN3Cf+D8IY86lBll7rfuKvMjjCrBrhPd+hegv
 QtMSNWervyDn40YT22prW1SYV2XNkSNZjBY3xdZi+5HzAKGDcC2XBeHGQDEsBESte7b+
 dCGA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.88.194 with SMTP id bi2mr29230219wib.71.1404137616773;
 Mon, 30 Jun 2014 07:13:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.212.138 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 07:13:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CACdvZqbRaFm1YGm4RV3ZtBORA05kwVGk499Kob1dVo2B7V8ZKg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACdvZqbRaFm1YGm4RV3ZtBORA05kwVGk499Kob1dVo2B7V8ZKg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:13:36 +0200
Message-ID: <CACdvZqZPe0QNPNL3Xy0Dohz2C-mSpqC47bXiLp2T1YFgySMaWg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Intel Baytrail panics because of buggy ACPI table
From: tallison <talisson@gmail.com>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:13:39 -0000

Hi,

Doesn't anyone know if this fix will make it into 9.3 RELEASE?
IMO it would probably be worth making a point release for this fix if not.
A 9.3.1, and perhaps a 10.0.1 or something like that.

As said a lot of these boards are being sold, and many end up in home
servers that run FreeBSD.
I have noticed there are occasional mails about this problem in the list
already, and I suspect there are many others trying FreeBSD, FreeNAS etc
that run into this kernel panic and then just decide to try something else.


On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 1:21 AM, tallison <talisson@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Intel Bay Trail/Silvermont devices are becoming quite popular.
> Unfortunately current FreeBSD releases don't work on them, as they get a
> kernel panic.
> A patch for this has been implemented in Linux, and a few months ago in
> FreeBSD CURRENT as well. A few weeks ago I asked that it be included into
> the STABLE branches as well, so that it makes its way into the next
> releases.
>
> I can see that it was added to the STABLE branches a few days ago, as per
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187966
>
> Now my question is this; will this fix make its way into 9.3 RELEASE, or
> is it too late?
> Would be good if it did IMO, as said a lot of people are buying Bay Trail
> struff.
>
> BR
> talisson
>