From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 30 14:13:39 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F629D93 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:13:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x234.google.com (mail-wg0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C12D92BDE for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:13:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id b13so8159579wgh.23 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 07:13:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=wD0aWvubhbTrFJCE/qeYnlyrU3uaAzhRHNbvB9W1NWo=; b=GBNEZMQc7um7NyxMoVneMyLYxeqWhsgTiwq6xQRwAKIsVly5I4VR25331Dw9QzCOcy 4ugc8rA2XGm8vEec+qSE3NGdiJnDgiz08jRejW+irlYFfKYWCaKPo6R/ZDSQ8O/3cG6N UOZydAqlEBcwSPlQ/TiQljFxdBkAMB48Og9Eu7fh2X2FE+8brRXPMX3GJ49HhNXbjjfQ bzb3TR76F8QBaLPTSrylfm+QksD2QCTRN3Cf+D8IY86lBll7rfuKvMjjCrBrhPd+hegv QtMSNWervyDn40YT22prW1SYV2XNkSNZjBY3xdZi+5HzAKGDcC2XBeHGQDEsBESte7b+ dCGA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.88.194 with SMTP id bi2mr29230219wib.71.1404137616773; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 07:13:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.212.138 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 07:13:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:13:36 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Intel Baytrail panics because of buggy ACPI table From: tallison To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:13:39 -0000 Hi, Doesn't anyone know if this fix will make it into 9.3 RELEASE? IMO it would probably be worth making a point release for this fix if not. A 9.3.1, and perhaps a 10.0.1 or something like that. As said a lot of these boards are being sold, and many end up in home servers that run FreeBSD. I have noticed there are occasional mails about this problem in the list already, and I suspect there are many others trying FreeBSD, FreeNAS etc that run into this kernel panic and then just decide to try something else. On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 1:21 AM, tallison wrote: > Hello, > > Intel Bay Trail/Silvermont devices are becoming quite popular. > Unfortunately current FreeBSD releases don't work on them, as they get a > kernel panic. > A patch for this has been implemented in Linux, and a few months ago in > FreeBSD CURRENT as well. A few weeks ago I asked that it be included into > the STABLE branches as well, so that it makes its way into the next > releases. > > I can see that it was added to the STABLE branches a few days ago, as per > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187966 > > Now my question is this; will this fix make its way into 9.3 RELEASE, or > is it too late? > Would be good if it did IMO, as said a lot of people are buying Bay Trail > struff. > > BR > talisson >