From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 29 09:29:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C541416A405 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 09:29:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matyee@mail.alba.hu) Received: from mta02.mail.t-online.hu (mta02.mail.t-online.hu [195.228.240.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8899C13C4B7 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 09:29:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matyee@mail.alba.hu) Received: from peteruj (dsl51B6FBF9.fixip.t-online.hu [81.182.251.249]) by mail.axelero.hu (Postfix) with SMTP id 48A2C33CA67 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 11:29:19 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <005301c771e4$bb0a3900$6502a8c0@peteruj> From: =?ISO-8859-1?B?U3phYvMgUOl0ZXI=?= To: References: <003401c7712a$f71ebb60$6502a8c0@peteruj> <005c01c77134$28e0fce0$6502a8c0@peteruj> <86zm5xph7o.fsf@dwp.des.no> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 11:29:17 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Subject: Re: raid3 is slow X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 09:29:22 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dag-Erling "Smřrgrav"" > > Szabó Péter writes: > > # graid3 list > > > > Geom name: nmivol > > State: DEGRADED > > First of all, your array is degraded. The graid3 output shows only > four components. Unless the missing fifth component happens to be the > parity disk, geom_raid3 will have to reconstruct your data on the fly. > > Second, you say nothing about which spindles the components are on and > how those spindles are attached to the system. If some of those > components are on the same spindle, or if some of those spindles are > on the same ATA channel, performance will suffer considerably. Array problem solved. But my problem is not the low read/write performance, my problem is the high load. I start a single bittorrent download to the encoded raid3 partition with 2.5MB/s speed, and the load is 2.5. Matyee