From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 12 05:39:17 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A20911065670; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 05:39:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wollman@hergotha.csail.mit.edu) Received: from hergotha.csail.mit.edu (hergotha.csail.mit.edu [66.92.79.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E5D48FC18; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 05:39:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hergotha.csail.mit.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hergotha.csail.mit.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nBC5O8bh020235; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 00:24:08 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wollman@hergotha.csail.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by hergotha.csail.mit.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nBC5O8xP020232; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 00:24:08 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wollman) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19235.10488.325168.267306@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 00:24:08 -0500 From: Garrett Wollman To: Hajimu UMEMOTO In-Reply-To: References: <200912102225.nBAMPrZx076758@svn.freebsd.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 21) "Educational Television" XEmacs Lucid X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (hergotha.csail.mit.edu [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 12 Dec 2009 00:24:08 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=disabled version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on hergotha.csail.mit.edu Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r200369 - in head: etc share/termcap X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 05:39:17 -0000 < said: > It's great, thank!! > I believe that our xterm entry was modified not to clear screen when > applications such as less(1) are terminated. Are there any chance to > back to the behavior? I don't understand why people put up with the unspeakably obnoxious "alternate screen" behavior. Please don't tell me someone actually thinks it's *useful*. -GAWollman