From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Dec 9 21:23:24 2000 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 9 21:23:23 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtp1.cluster.oleane.net (smtp1.cluster.oleane.net [195.25.12.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59B7E37B400 for ; Sat, 9 Dec 2000 21:23:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from diabolic-cow.chatgris.net (dyn-1-1-026.Orl.dialup.oleane.fr [195.25.26.26]) by smtp1.cluster.oleane.net with ESMTP id eBA5NJl30092 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 06:23:20 +0100 (CET) Received: by diabolic-cow.chatgris.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 81BEB244; Sat, 9 Dec 2000 11:22:47 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 11:22:47 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9mi_Guyomarch?= To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFIREWALL or IPFILTER? Message-ID: <20001209112247.A22773@diabolic-cow.chatgris.net> References: <00dd01c05e2e$e42a0700$0b6cffc8@infolink.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <00dd01c05e2e$e42a0700$0b6cffc8@infolink.com.br>; from apina@infolink.com.br on Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 06:15:02PM -0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 06:15:02PM -0200, Antonio Carlos Pina wrote: > Hello, > > I believe (sorry if I'm wrong) that you can't use DUMMYNET with IPFILTER, > only with IPFW. You're wrong. > Besides that, I've seen a lot of people saying that IPFILTER is better than > IPFW (faster, more powerful, etc) Don't know if it's faster, but IPFilter is definitely way more powerful. -- Rémi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message