From owner-freebsd-questions  Tue Jun 26  1:10:34 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from exchange.twowaytv.co.uk (exchange.twowaytv.co.uk [194.6.2.173])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1229837B405
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 01:10:33 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from ADyas@twowaytv.com)
Received: by exchange.twowaytv.co.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
	id <NMA00F1T>; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 09:07:04 +0100
Message-ID: <911D8F660DF6D411B61F00500462BA01A84EC2@exchange.twowaytv.co.uk>
From: Alex Dyas <ADyas@twowaytv.com>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: which is faster zip drive under FreeBSD: usb or parallel?
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 09:07:03 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-questions.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-questions>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-questions>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

As an aside, I have yet to get my parallel port zip100 to work with FreeBSD
(4.0).  Machine at home so I can't give the exact error, but it happens
during the boot sequence, something like a timeout on the device.  Anyone
any ideas?

> It would seem parallel has more throughput, but it might not 
> be so simple.
> Does anyone know how the usb zip compares to parallel port models?

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message