Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 12:38:02 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> To: Lou Kamenov <loukamenov@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Distributed file systems or the like. Message-ID: <20060526123707.E18347@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <76f962c60605251659q45ec5cc8t31cc8c1da5f4f42b@mail.gmail.com> References: <20060525125227.65f4b1df@zerda> <4475EE6E.3090004@centtech.com> <20060525130319.21a19a0e@zerda> <76f962c60605251659q45ec5cc8t31cc8c1da5f4f42b@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 25 May 2006, Lou Kamenov wrote: > On 5/25/06, Zane C.B. <zanecb@midwest-connections.com> wrote: >> On Thu, 25 May 2006 12:50:38 -0500 >> Eric Anderson <anderson@centtech.com> wrote: >> > NFS? >> NFS is nice, but it does not help when it comes to keeping a duplicate >> set of files on a second file server that is kept up to date in real >> time. > > NFS + ssync. > > AFS, CODA replicated volumes. FYI, AFS supports replication of read-only volumes, but not of writable volumes. Coda supports read-write replication, but there may be usability issues in resolving conflicts in the presence of network partitions. Robert N M Watson
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060526123707.E18347>