From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 31 07:34:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39A1516A5BE for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2006 07:34:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (cell.sick.ru [217.72.144.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A714F13C457 for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2006 07:34:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (glebius@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id kBV74s8a082231 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 31 Dec 2006 10:04:54 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id kBV74s4T082230; Sun, 31 Dec 2006 10:04:54 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: cell.sick.ru: glebius set sender to glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 10:04:53 +0300 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Paolo Pisati Message-ID: <20061231070453.GV46380@FreeBSD.org> References: <20061230195219.GD64111@bunrab.catwhisker.org> <20061230214321.GG64111@bunrab.catwhisker.org> <20061230214609.GA6996@tin.it> <200612302304.39194.max@love2party.net> <20061231024203.GA8147@tin.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061231024203.GA8147@tin.it> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Cc: Max Laier , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Can't link kernel after recent libalias commits? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 07:34:44 -0000 On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 03:42:03AM +0100, Paolo Pisati wrote: P> On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 11:04:33PM +0100, Max Laier wrote: P> > On Saturday 30 December 2006 22:46, Paolo Pisati wrote: P> > > On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 01:43:21PM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: P> > > > Note that this was for a kernel that uses ipfw, but not natd (ref. P> > > > src/sys/conf/NOTES). P> > > P> > > my mistake, i'll write an entry for UPDATING. P> > P> > Shouldn't it still be possible to build a kernel with IPFW but without P> > LIBALIAS? i.e. instead of a UPDATING entry you should just wrap the P> > libalias entry points in IPFW - or am I misunderstanding what you are P> > saying? P> P> with my last commit, LIBALIAS became mandatory for IPFW, and this adds P> 40kb (-O nocona) to my kernel size. P> P> If it's really an issue, i can change it. As I said it will be very nice if it would be still possible to build ipfw(4) w/o libalias. I think more people will share my opinion. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE