Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 12:58:58 +0200 From: "Pav Lucistnik" <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Frank Laszlo <laszlof@vonostingroup.com>, Serge Gagnon <serge.gagnon@b2b2c.ca> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports structure and improvement suggestions Message-ID: <20060511105834.M94745@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <44631677.7040409@vonostingroup.com> References: <20060508200926.GA6005@daemons.gr> <20060508212441.GB767@picobyte.net> <e3tcpq$fc1$1@sea.gmane.org> <20060510190606.GH44733@iib.unsam.edu.ar> <e3to04$o4n$1@sea.gmane.org> <0IZ200LU6MUTD391@VL-MH-MR002.ip.videotron.ca> <44631677.7040409@vonostingroup.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 11 May 2006 06:48:23 -0400, Frank Laszlo wrote
> Serge Gagnon wrote:
> > If you're talking about message that the port is saying about KNOB, try
> > grep ECHO Makefile and if you're talking about message while the port is
> > installing stuff, try cat pkg-message before installing this port ;-)
> >
>
> As I said before, a simple method to fix this problem would be to
> extend the way OPTIONS works, where we create a new target to list
> possibly options for the port, and require maintainers to keep it up
> to date. i.e.
>
> # make options
> ===> Options for foo/bar.
> WITH_BAR Build port with support for bar
> WITH_FOO blah
> WITH_A blah blah...
>
> This would be fairly simple to implement using the current way
> OPTIONS are handled, I'll add this to my list of todo items.
We already have this. Tried make showconfig?
--
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
<pav@FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060511105834.M94745>