From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 30 14:47:59 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B54FD80 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:47:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA6952F3B for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:47:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1X1cs9-000FBM-VD; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:47:57 +0200 Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:47:57 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: tallison , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel Baytrail panics because of buggy ACPI table Message-ID: <20140630144757.GZ2586@home.opsec.eu> References: <20140630142401.GY2586@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140630142401.GY2586@home.opsec.eu> X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:47:59 -0000 Hi! > > Doesn't anyone know if this fix will make it into 9.3 RELEASE? > > I asked re@ to include it, as far as > > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.3/sys/x86/acpica/madt.c?view=log > > says, it's not yet included. re@ gave the hint to ask the committer involved, rodrigc@. I sent him a mail and updated the ticket. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 6 years to go !