From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Mar 5 17:18:05 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA22556 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 17:18:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.netcetera.dk (root@sleipner.netcetera.dk [194.192.207.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA22478 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 1998 17:17:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from leifn@image.dk) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by mail.netcetera.dk (8.8.8/8.8.8) with UUCP id CAA29656 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Fri, 6 Mar 1998 02:17:04 +0100 Received: by swimsuit.swimsuit.roskildebc.dk (0.99.970109) id AA04089; 06 Mar 98 01:20:26 +0100 From: leifn@image.dk (Leif Neland) Date: 05 Mar 98 23:33:48 +0100 Subject: Re: Cluster? Message-ID: <520_9803060120@swimsuit.swimsuit.roskildebc.dk> References: Organization: Fidonet: Swimsuit Safari. Go for it. To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 05 Mar 98 17:54:20 Tom (2:234/49.99) wrote to All regarding Re: Cluster? in area "freebsd-hacker" >> address spaces of all the others. I agree that DNS has fault tolerant >> capabilities but I wouldn't call them excellent, its annoying to have to >> wait for requests to the primary to time out before the resolver >> library starts hitting on the secondaries. T> Speak for your own resolver. I can't even tell if a primary T> fails. In one case I know, the first timeout is 5 seconds, before trying the secondary. The next timeout is 10, then 20 and finally 40 seconds. Your mileage may vary. Leif Neland leifn@image.dk --- |Fidonet: Leif Neland 2:234/49 |Internet: leifn@image.dk To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message