Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2004 22:17:54 +0200 From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ACPI-CA 20040527 import Message-ID: <xzphdsorgjx.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20040702215054.GA54100@xor.obsecurity.org> (Kris Kennaway's message of "Fri, 2 Jul 2004 14:50:54 -0700") References: <200407020815.i628F5sp016504@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040702100347.GA9202@laptop.6bone.nl> <xzpd63eipfx.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040702161947.GI779@laptop.6bone.nl> <xzpk6xms6ve.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040702215054.GA54100@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> writes: > It's a bit disingenuous to criticize someone for not building with -O2 > and then noting in the next email that there's a known bug with -O2. No, it isn't. The bug is there because we've been shoving that kind of thing under the carpet for years, and the best way to stop doing that is to make -O2 mandatory for developers. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzphdsorgjx.fsf>