Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 18:17:01 +0700 (ALMST) From: Boris Popov <bp@butya.kz> To: Jonathon Doran <doranj@Colorado.EDU> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: samba fs Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9906301805130.44896-100000@lion.butya.kz> In-Reply-To: <199906292257.QAA13764@ucsu.Colorado.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 29 Jun 1999, Jonathon Doran wrote: > > Are there any plans to create a way to = > > mount=20 > > windows samba nfs? like linux's sambafs. I have tried sharityd, but its = > > not that=20 > > great. > > The short answer: I hope not [skip] > > I'm a bit troubled by the Linux philosophy of putting stuff in the kernel > which should be left in user-land. Sharity shows that this function can > exist in user-land, and so preserve some sanity in the kernel. I'm unsure that client file system code should go in user-land. This creates additional context switches, data copies etc. which certainly doesn't increase perfomance and put an additional overhead on CPU. > > Jon Doran > > NB: I was a bit amused as the discussion of placing Mozilla in the Linux > kernel. <waiting a bit for the audience to recover> Yes, now instead of > restarting the browser, you can reboot your box. :))) -- Boris Popov http://www.butya.kz/~bp/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9906301805130.44896-100000>