From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 17 15:55:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F80516A41F for ; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 15:55:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from patfbsde@davenulle.org) Received: from smtp.lamaiziere.net (lamaiziere.net [213.41.172.177]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEA2443D83 for ; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 15:54:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from patfbsde@davenulle.org) Received: from [192.168.0.59] (unknown [192.168.0.59]) by smtp.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFE2FA6C14 for ; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 16:54:50 +0100 (CET) From: Patrick =?iso-8859-1?q?Lamaizi=E8re?= Organization: >/dave/nulle To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 16:54:44 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512171654.44214.patfbsde@davenulle.org> Subject: compat Linux and ELF type X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 15:55:03 -0000 Hello, Could you explain to me why Linux executables are of brand "Linux" and Linux libraries "SVR4" ? $ brandelf /compat/linux/bin/ls File '/compat/linux/bin/ls' is of brand 'Linux' (3). $ brandelf /compat/linux/lib/libc-2.3.2.so File '/compat/linux/lib/libc-2.3.2.so' is of brand 'SVR4' (0). May it is a stupid question! Thanks.