From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 6 23:46:28 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F141E37B401 for ; Sun, 6 Jul 2003 23:46:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xorpc.icir.org (xorpc.icir.org [192.150.187.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CB7843F3F for ; Sun, 6 Jul 2003 23:46:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rizzo@xorpc.icir.org) Received: from xorpc.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.8p1/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h676kRkN045438; Sun, 6 Jul 2003 23:46:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rizzo@xorpc.icir.org) Received: (from rizzo@localhost) by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.8p1/8.12.3/Submit) id h676kOBI045437; Sun, 6 Jul 2003 23:46:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rizzo) Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2003 23:46:24 -0700 From: Luigi Rizzo To: Michael Sierchio Message-ID: <20030706234624.A45394@xorpc.icir.org> References: <200307070113.h671DPeG082710@freefall.freebsd.org> <3F08DABB.2020509@tenebras.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <3F08DABB.2020509@tenebras.com>; from kudzu@tenebras.com on Sun, Jul 06, 2003 at 07:28:11PM -0700 cc: freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.org cc: ari.suutari@syncrontech.com Subject: Re: kern/53624: patches for ipfw2 to support ipsec packet filtering X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2003 06:46:28 -0000 On Sun, Jul 06, 2003 at 07:28:11PM -0700, Michael Sierchio wrote: > Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > Synopsis: patches for ipfw2 to support ipsec packet filtering > > > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > > State-Changed-By: luigi > > State-Changed-When: Sun Jul 6 18:13:14 PDT 2003 > > State-Changed-Why: > > committed, thanks > > > Question: How does this interact with Sam Leffler's FAST_IPSEC ? i believe it works in the way you mention. luigi > That is, may we instead of > > options IPFIREWALL > options IPSEC > options IPSEC_ESP > options IPSEC_FILTERGIF > > do this > options IPFIREWALL > options FAST_IPSEC > options IPSEC_FILTERGIF > ? > >