Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 12:06:52 -0700 From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Things to remove from /rescue Message-ID: <20030724120652.B33961@xorpc.icir.org> In-Reply-To: <20030724185933.GC85582@dragon.nuxi.com>; from obrien@freebsd.org on Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 11:59:33AM -0700 References: <20030719171138.GA86442@dragon.nuxi.com> <XFMail.20030721151553.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20030721202314.GC21068@dragon.nuxi.com> <xzpn0f76i69.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20030722151138.GB72888@dragon.nuxi.com> <20030722153056.GM863@starjuice.net> <20030723002531.GA44452@kokeb.ambesa.net> <20030724185933.GC85582@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 11:59:33AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 08:25:32PM -0400, Mike Makonnen wrote: ... > > base system. IMO, /rescue should be the absolute essentials _only_. > > Instead of theorizing reasons why someone might need ipfw and friends, > > why don't we wait until we get a bug report about a specific situation > > in which it was needed before we put it back in. > > Thank you for expressing this so well. I do think we should wait for > PR's telling real experiences rather than theorizing so much in the "what > if"'s. then just nuke everything from /rescue and waif for PR's... :) cheers luigi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030724120652.B33961>