From owner-freebsd-libh Thu Nov 14 8:27:58 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-libh@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC56037B401 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 08:27:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.qc.uunet.ca (mail1.qc.uunet.ca [198.168.54.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F137443E75 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 08:27:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anarcat@espresso-com.com) Received: from xtanbul.studio.espresso-com.com ([216.94.147.57]) by mail1.qc.uunet.ca (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id gAEGRWZ05887; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 11:27:32 -0500 Received: from anarcat by xtanbul.studio.espresso-com.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18CMps-0004gK-00; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 11:27:20 -0500 Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 11:27:20 -0500 From: The Anarcat To: Alexander Langer Cc: Jordan K Hubbard , libh@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem confirmed (?) and death to lib[h]disk (!) (Re: serious libh linking problems) Message-ID: <20021114162719.GA17967@xtanbul.studio.espresso-com.com> References: <20021113040224.GB9054@lenny.anarcat.ath.cx> <69CC05B0-F6BD-11D6-9957-000393BB9222@queasyweasel.com> <20021113042755.GD9054@lenny.anarcat.ath.cx> <20021113144354.GW94076@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de> <20021113165424.GA9768@xtanbul.studio.espresso-com.com> <20021113183614.GD94076@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de> <20021113213317.GG9829@xtanbul.studio.espresso-com.com> <20021114104821.GK94076@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021114104821.GK94076@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-libh@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu Nov 14, 2002 at 11:48:21AM +0100, Alexander Langer wrote: > Thus spake The Anarcat (anarcat@anarcat.ath.cx): > > > Can't you just drop libhdisk from the build? I think it needs to die > > anyways. I doubt anything really depends on it apart from the disk > > editor. If you agree, I'll start getting libh free of libhdisk. We'll > > have to rewrite the disk editor, but I don't see that as a problem at > > all. > > I was about to just delete the functions that are no longer supported. > However, I don't know how far we use, for example, the clone() function, > which is also accessible from within TCL. Fine with me. I don't remember using the clone() function from tcl. > I #ifdef'ed other functions to return 0 instead on -current, since > e.g. MakeDev() etc aren#t needed on -CURRENT which has devfs. Great. > I'd like to RIP all the RELENG_4 stuff at least, that way we can still > have a more or less working libdisk. Do whatever is needed to get this thing to build. A. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message