From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan  5 22:00:22 2005
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0F6AD16A4CE; Wed,  5 Jan 2005 22:00:22 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [168.103.84.182])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 98B6143D2F; Wed,  5 Jan 2005 22:00:21 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j05Lv9KF090523;
	Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:57:09 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 14:57:09 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <20050105.145709.74659919.imp@harmony.village.org>
To: colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk
From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org>
In-Reply-To: <41DC60CD.8000802@wadham.ox.ac.uk>
References: <40695.1104961386@critter.freebsd.dk>
	<41DC60CD.8000802@wadham.ox.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: src-committers@freebsd.org
cc: jhb@freebsd.org
cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org
cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org
cc: phk@phk.freebsd.dk
cc: imp@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man9 style.9
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 22:00:22 -0000

phk>A harder problem is to detect when the copyright ends.

End of the comment (or first blank line for those languages that don't
have block comments).  Remember, my script grabs the entire license,
not just the copyright notice.

colin> Is there a good reason why we can't just say that the copyright
colin> statement must be the first comment block which includes the
colin> string "opyright"?

Yes.  There are many files that have multiple copyright blocks.  There
are files whose license statement says "this file is in the public
domain" and there are some files that use an abbreviation of
Copyright, as allowed by the copyright laws at one point.

Warner