From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Feb 8 04:14:54 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id EAA08402 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 8 Feb 1997 04:14:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from mexico.brainstorm.eu.org (root@mexico.brainstorm.fr [193.56.58.253]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA08397 for ; Sat, 8 Feb 1997 04:14:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from brasil.brainstorm.eu.org (brasil.brainstorm.fr [193.56.58.33]) by mexico.brainstorm.eu.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id NAA03398 for ; Sat, 8 Feb 1997 13:14:35 +0100 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by brasil.brainstorm.eu.org (8.8.4/8.6.12) with UUCP id NAA08462 for hackers@freebsd.org; Sat, 8 Feb 1997 13:14:19 +0100 Received: (from roberto@localhost) by keltia.freenix.fr (8.8.5/keltia-uucp-2.9) id KAA19993; Sat, 8 Feb 1997 10:49:17 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <19970208104917.FP56746@keltia.freenix.fr> Date: Sat, 8 Feb 1997 10:49:17 +0100 From: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr (Ollivier Robert) To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DES for 2.1.6? References: X-Mailer: Mutt 0.60,1-3,9 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT ctm#2999 In-Reply-To: ; from John Lind on Feb 8, 1997 00:04:17 -0600 Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk According to John Lind: > good reason, and I understand that). Can I use the DES source from > 2.1.5 that I have tucked away on another machine? Unfortunately, > I do not have the sources, just the binaries. I don't think there have been signifiant changes in the DES code between 2.1.5 and 2.1.6. Check the CVS logs on the Web for details. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 3.0-CURRENT #39: Sun Feb 2 22:12:44 CET 1997