Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:03:42 +0100 From: rank1seeker@gmail.com To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CPUTYPE and friends, from 'make.conf' benchmark Message-ID: <20111206.170342.731.2@DOMY-PC> In-Reply-To: <CAGH67wTjGyhWAMYsCtzp8X7nN=yswOGntO=46AmT7yxymHSQ%2Bg@mail.gmail.com> References: <20111205.171654.020.1@DOMY-PC> <CAGH67wTjGyhWAMYsCtzp8X7nN=yswOGntO=46AmT7yxymHSQ%2Bg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
# /bin/sh -c "gcc -v -x c -E -mtune=3Dnative /dev/null -o /dev/null 2>&1 | = grep mtune | sed -e 's/.*mtune=3D//'"=0D=0Ageneric=0D=0A=0D=0AFor target = machine, it returned 'generic'=0D=0A=0D=0ANow only with CPUTYPE in = 'make.conf':=0D=0A--=0D=0ACPUTYPE?=3Dcore2=0D=0A--=0D=0A=0D=0A> Also, you = should set these in src.conf. Sticking them in make.conf is=0D=0A> going = to annoy people when you ask why your ports are breaking ;)=0D=0A> = =0D=0A> Chris=0D=0A=0D=0AI want my ports, to also be optimized for target = CPU, not just base.=0D=0ANone of my ports got broken = yet.=0D=0A=0D=0ARebuilded can ...=0D=0A=0D=0ATests are started AFTER a = reboot!=0D=0AThere is no bgfsck, as per = rc.conf:=0D=0A--=0D=0Abackground_fsck=3DNO=0D=0Afsck_y_enable=3DYES=0D=0Afsck_y_flags=3D-C=0D=0A--=0D=0A=0D=0ASame = multiuser enviroment=0D=0ATest done once.=0D=0A=0D=0AAfter running: '# = time unixbench', final score was:=0D=0A=A0 =A0395.4=0D=0ACompleted in = 22.8 min=0D=0A=0D=0ATime is SAME as with generic binaries, but score is = just a 1.2 higher, which is too small to be relevant.=0D=0AWhat do you = think about this?=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0ADomagoj Smol=E8i=E6
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111206.170342.731.2>