From owner-freebsd-doc Mon Feb 11 12:50: 7 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8956537B416 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 12:50:02 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g1BKo2u79814; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 12:50:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 12:50:02 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200202112050.g1BKo2u79814@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Cc: From: "Jakob Borg" Subject: Re: docs/34758: Irrelevant comment in killall(1) manpage Reply-To: "Jakob Borg" Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR docs/34758; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Jakob Borg" To: swear@blarg.net (Gary W. Swearingen), rantapaa@uswest.net Cc: Peter Pentchev , bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, Giorgos Keramidas Subject: Re: docs/34758: Irrelevant comment in killall(1) manpage Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 21:40:21 +0100 On Monday 11 February 2002 18.38, Gary W. Swearingen wrote: > From pkg-comment: > A port of the Linux pstree, killall and pidof commands > > It seems wrong to ask the Linux people to make the Linux "killall" man > page to not mention "Linux" (or "non-Linux" in this case). I suppose > it makes some sense, so others will disagree, but if you're going to ask > them to change, please be extraordinarily polite. I wouldn't presume to suggest that that manpage be changed - my entire problem report was dependant on it being a FreeBSD manpage, which it isn't. I think the report has the status 'closed' now, and it would be best to leave it there. -- Jakob Borg | jakob@borg.pp.se | +46 (0)46 397692 Kämnärsv. 3a214 / SE-226 46 Lund / Sweden To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message