From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Aug  9 22:41:48 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA03904
          for current-outgoing; Sat, 9 Aug 1997 22:41:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA03898;
          Sat, 9 Aug 1997 22:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1])
	by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA00914;
	Sat, 9 Aug 1997 22:41:40 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199708100541.WAA00914@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96
To: Jeffrey Hsu <hsu@FreeBSD.ORG>
cc: ccsanady@friley01.res.iastate.edu, current@hub.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: exmh and current.. anyone? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 09 Aug 1997 22:06:46 PDT."
             <199708100506.WAA03148@hub.freebsd.org> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sat, 09 Aug 1997 22:41:40 -0700
From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>From The Desk Of Jeffrey Hsu :
>   > How do you work around the stupid tcl8 problem?
> 
> I had to do this the other day and I just ftp'ed the tcl8 and tk8
> distribution from ftp.smli.com, untarred them in the same subdirectory,
> and built and installed just tk.

Hmm...

I think we have bigger problem and that is perhaps some that are 
running current shouldn't be running current.

	Amancio