From owner-freebsd-multimedia Sun Feb 14 04:00:26 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA21608 for freebsd-multimedia-outgoing; Sun, 14 Feb 1999 04:00:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk (bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk [128.16.5.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id EAA21598 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 1999 04:00:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from O.Hodson@cs.ucl.ac.uk) Received: from scary.cs.ucl.ac.uk by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id ; Sun, 14 Feb 1999 12:00:16 +0000 To: Peter Parnes cc: multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: good or bad idea ? (vat-related...) In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 14 Feb 1999 11:09:40 +0100." <199902141009.LAA13972@basil.cdt.luth.se> Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 12:00:15 +0100 Message-ID: <613.918993615@cs.ucl.ac.uk> From: Orion Hodson Sender: owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org <199902141009.LAA13972@basil.cdt.luth.se>Peter Parnes writes: > > luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it said: > > I am not 100% sure that passing URL's in RTCP fields is totally out of > > scope (will check). > > No it is not. There is a type called application specific data that > could be used for transmitting the current URL but remember that > there are people using other types of tools for MBone-audio > conferencing than vat and rat. Yes, you can use the APP field, but this is really 'other' application data rather than application data. Anyway, it's still better on a separate stream... - o To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-multimedia" in the body of the message