Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:56:13 -0800 (PST) From: mjacob@freebsd.org To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CAM rescanner thread? Message-ID: <20070215175554.X56445@ns1.feral.com> In-Reply-To: <45D4F7C8.7050903@samsco.org> References: <20070104225519.Q92958@ns1.feral.com> <459E8AE7.90104@samsco.org> <20070105093930.Y34456@ns1.feral.com> <459E97E6.4000603@samsco.org> <459E989C.2020602@samsco.org> <20070105103431.A34456@ns1.feral.com> <20070105104021.D34456@ns1.feral.com> <45A9225D.4080907@scsiguy.com> <20070215145657.N45611@ns1.feral.com> <45D4F7C8.7050903@samsco.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
And you didn't check it in because....? On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Scott Long wrote: > Matthew Jacob wrote: >> >> Following up from this, belatedly, I see lots of good stuff, and: >> >> >>> With the discovery process moved to a >>> thread and some augmentation to XPT_SCAN_*, we should be good enough >>> for now. >> >> So, in principle a thread for rescanning seems appropriate to you? >> >> -matt >> > > I've had various prototypes of this in the past. > > Scott > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070215175554.X56445>