From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 9 16:51:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8C1B1065678 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 16:51:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sysadmin@alexdupre.com) Received: from lab.alexdupre.com (cl-506.trn-01.it.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:1418:100:1f9::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFBC98FC27 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 16:51:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67513 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 16:50:59 -0000 Received: from atom.alexdupre.com (HELO ?192.168.178.12?) (sysadmin@alexdupre.com@192.168.178.12) by lab.alexdupre.com with ESMTPSA; 9 Apr 2010 16:50:59 -0000 Message-ID: <4BBF5AF5.4010608@alexdupre.com> Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 18:51:01 +0200 From: Alex Dupre User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; it; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 SeaMonkey/2.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu References: <201004090934.o399YiqG015412@repoman.freebsd.org> <20100409191817.26539919@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <20100409191817.26539919@it.buh.tecnik93.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Alex Dupre , ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports MOVED UPDATING ports/databases Makefile ports/devel Makefile ports/graphics Makefile ports/security Makefile ports/Mk bsd.php.mk ports/databases/php5-dbase Makefile ports/devel/php5-ncurses Makefile ports/devel/php5-pcre Makefile ... X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 16:51:02 -0000 Ion-Mihai Tetcu ha scritto: > #1 Please fix the ton of ports you broke. Ton? I expected a few obsolate thirdy party extensions to break and they should be removed, but not ton of ports. If you have a list, send me, please. > #2 You just made everybody working on the big updates having to redo > the patches. Why doesn't this qualify as a "big update"? I touched only the php port, why everybody should redo the patches? In any case the update has been announced in ports@ many times with detailed patches and timings. -- Alex Dupre