From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 14:28:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05EB116A4CF for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 14:28:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.transactionware.com (mail.transactionware.com [203.14.245.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2BA2843D31 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 14:28:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from janm@transactionware.com) Received: (qmail 37648 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2004 22:29:03 -0000 Received: from new.transactionware.com (192.168.1.55) by dm.transactionware.com with SMTP; 12 Feb 2004 22:29:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 62853 invoked by uid 1006); 12 Feb 2004 22:29:03 -0000 Received: from janm@transactionware.com by new.transactionware.com Clear:0. Processed in 0.488067 secs); 12 Feb 2004 22:29:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mosm1) (192.168.2.2) by new.transactionware.com with SMTP; 12 Feb 2004 22:29:02 -0000 From: "Jan Mikkelsen" To: "'Damian Gerow'" , Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 09:26:31 +1100 Organization: Transactionware Message-ID: <000701c3f1b7$441dd1e0$0202a8c0@mosm1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 In-Reply-To: <20040212171457.GF56315@sentex.net> Importance: Normal Subject: RE: Multiple SSL Domains on one IP ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 22:28:45 -0000 Hi, > IIRC, someone pointed out a working group that was > establishing a standard > to allow for multiple SSL sites on one IP address. However, > I cannot find > the link or any reference to the post, nor remember where I saw it. It's now RFC 3546 (TLS Extensions), where virtual hosting is one of the extensions. I know Microsoft, Akamai and Intel have asked implementation related questions. For now, you need a separate address/port combination for each certificate you want to use with https. As RFC 3546 is deployed, that will change. Regards, Jan Mikkelsen janm@transactionware.com