From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Sep  6 14:49:18 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60732744;
 Sat,  6 Sep 2014 14:49:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D55411E8E;
 Sat,  6 Sep 2014 14:49:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id s86En3uS074949;
 Sun, 7 Sep 2014 00:49:03 +1000 (EST)
 (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au)
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2014 00:49:03 +1000 (EST)
From: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>
To: Kubilay Kocak <koobs@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Needs triage ..
In-Reply-To: <540B0C87.9070005@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20140907004047.F58647@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
References: <20140906221516.Q58647@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
 <20140906125502.GA1892@elch.exwg.net>
 <20140906230043.H58647@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <540B0C87.9070005@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Christoph Moench-Tegeder <cmt@burggraben.net>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 14:49:18 -0000

On Sat, 6 Sep 2014 23:30:47 +1000, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
 > On 6/09/2014 11:23 PM, Ian Smith wrote:
 > > On Sat, 6 Sep 2014 14:55:03 +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
 > >  > ## Ian Smith (smithi@nimnet.asn.au):
 > >  > 
 > >  > > Are these just getting auto-assigned to stable@?  Can anyone play? :)
 > >  > 
 > >  > The submitter explicitly adds stable@ to the bug's Cc list.
 > > 
 > > Yes, and this submitter hasn't posted in the dozen lists I take, since 
 > > May anyway.  This may save someone having to assign a bug, but perhaps 
 > > one shouldn't earn the 'mayCC' bit until some N>0 have been assigned?
 > > 
 > >  > But anyways, looking at the amount of panics he reports, most of which
 > >  > happen on rather trivial actions (as far as I can tell from my sampling
 > >  > of reports), this looks like bad hardware.
 > >  > If anyone with a hat could tell the sasamotikomi?
 > > 
 > > I'm more concerned about process (vs PRs) and bulk spam potential than 
 > > the reporting methods of any one submitter; bugzilla is overall cool.
 > > 
 > > cheers, Ian
 > 
 > Ian,
 > 
 > Please create an issue report assigned to bugmeister, with 'keyword:
 > feature' describing the issue, and thoughts on different ways you can
 > think of a mechanism potentially working.
 > 
 > --
 > Kubilay
 > for Bugmeister

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193396

No further ideas to hand beyond what I suggested above, sorry.

cheers, Ian