Date: Thu, 6 Nov 1997 14:53:01 +1030 From: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> To: John Kenagy <jktheowl@bga.com> Cc: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com>, FreeBSD Questions <questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: binhex format? Message-ID: <19971106145301.58638@lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.971105221814.234A-100000@barnowl>; from John Kenagy on Wed, Nov 05, 1997 at 10:20:38PM -0600 References: <19971106125327.64942@lemis.com> <Pine.BSF.3.95q.971105221814.234A-100000@barnowl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Nov 05, 1997 at 10:20:38PM -0600, John Kenagy wrote: > On Thu, 6 Nov 1997, Greg Lehey wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 05, 1997 at 06:12:32PM -0800, Bill Fenner wrote: >>> A search for "binhex" on http://www.freebsd.org/ports/ finds >>> >>> /usr/ports/converters/uudeview >>> >>> and >>> >>> /usr/ports/converters/xdeview >>> >>> both of which claim to do BinHex. (can also be found using >>> "grep -i binhex /usr/ports/INDEX") >> >> Oops. And I thought I'd checked everywhere... > > Let us know if these work. I tried them both on some files > purporting to be binhex with nothing to show for it. I did not > know if I was doing it wrong or what. > > Sender later used a different format that xdeview worked fine on. Thanks to everybody who answered this question. I chickened out and let somebody with a Mac decode it for me :-) I suppose some time I'll follow up the other suggestions. Greg
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19971106145301.58638>