From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu May  8 16:21:19 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA25867
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 8 May 1997 16:21:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from odin.visigenic.com (odin.visigenic.com [204.179.98.2])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA25862
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 8 May 1997 16:21:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from VSI48 (vsi48.visigenic.com [206.64.15.185])
          by odin.visigenic.com (Netscape Mail Server v2.02) with SMTP
          id AAA1375; Thu, 8 May 1997 16:20:58 -0700
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970508162042.009a7210@visigenic.com>
X-Sender: toneil@visigenic.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32)
Date: Thu, 08 May 1997 16:20:42 -0700
To: Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au>
From: "Tim Oneil" <toneil@visigenic.com>
Subject: Re: Applixware hangs
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Michael wrote:
>Adrian Chadd stands accused of saying:
>> 
>> > Thats not the latest. Red Hat is at 4.x something. Maybe you should
>> > get the latest version.
>> 
>> Maybe someone should make a new linuxlibs package up.. libc 5.0.x is just
>> far too outdated *grin*
>> 
>> (The current version is in the high 5.4s..)
>
>The current linux_lib libc is 5.4.23; good enough?

That figures! The salesclown at Fry's assured me the 4.1 box in my hand
was the latest!
Oh well, it sits in my closet at home anyway.
:)





If I wanted a signature, which I don't, I would use this.
-Tim