Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 20:08:25 +0200 From: Matthias Fechner <idefix@fechner.net> To: Steve Wills <steve@mouf.net>, Torsten Zuehlsdorff <tz@FreeBSD.org>, ruby@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help needed: net/rubygem-grpc Message-ID: <029a9c1f-de69-3bfd-ff89-1a02feb767a0@fechner.net> In-Reply-To: <2369ae1e-30cb-52d7-6697-a99139d74479@mouf.net> References: <4474b97e-88ec-ead8-bb13-79e5889bf237@FreeBSD.org> <b74007b8-02f7-0b58-7618-cc006074a6e1@mouf.net> <c5c542e2-c667-67b8-ec7b-6dd07069aa91@fechner.net> <bf97c60e-2076-cf5b-b587-48b978fdf51f@FreeBSD.org> <2369ae1e-30cb-52d7-6697-a99139d74479@mouf.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --acGtjEpTl7f57UevJDlS3kJqPqUtuvEVu Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="N9xw7snPwv6q0XU1fLFIM4TX8GdXlnDs6"; protected-headers="v1" From: Matthias Fechner <idefix@fechner.net> To: Steve Wills <steve@mouf.net>, Torsten Zuehlsdorff <tz@FreeBSD.org>, ruby@freebsd.org Message-ID: <029a9c1f-de69-3bfd-ff89-1a02feb767a0@fechner.net> Subject: Re: Help needed: net/rubygem-grpc References: <4474b97e-88ec-ead8-bb13-79e5889bf237@FreeBSD.org> <b74007b8-02f7-0b58-7618-cc006074a6e1@mouf.net> <c5c542e2-c667-67b8-ec7b-6dd07069aa91@fechner.net> <bf97c60e-2076-cf5b-b587-48b978fdf51f@FreeBSD.org> <2369ae1e-30cb-52d7-6697-a99139d74479@mouf.net> In-Reply-To: <2369ae1e-30cb-52d7-6697-a99139d74479@mouf.net> --N9xw7snPwv6q0XU1fLFIM4TX8GdXlnDs6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: en-US Thanks Steve, Am 28.06.2017 um 19:03 schrieb Steve Wills: > Yeah, I've updated the port to use the grpc from the port instead of th= e > bundled one. See attached (let me know if it doesn't come through). > There's still at least one problem with this because I'm also removing > the bundled ssl certs. I think it should use the ones from ca_root_nss > instead, I'm working on that. But first I want to figure out how to run= > the tests and that's taking a little extra time because the Gemfile > isn't included with the gem itself. Also, I'm sure the grpc developers > would consider this all wrong, but for us I think it's the right path. I already added it into our repository we work with: http://gitlab.toco-domains.de/FreeBSD/GitLab/commits/9.1 I hope that is ok for you? My poudiere is just building and I think it will take the full night: https://pkg.fechner.net/index.html I will try to do some tests (at least give the build a try). As I do not = have any experience with ruby, I do not really have an idea how to test i= t. Gru=C3=9F Matthias --=20 "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning." -- Rich Cook --N9xw7snPwv6q0XU1fLFIM4TX8GdXlnDs6-- --acGtjEpTl7f57UevJDlS3kJqPqUtuvEVu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAllT8J0ACgkQkZS/qRt1bvapwgCeMrJaJIn/JIitzzoyIMVJINEs Dm0AoJ8MnhTERVOnRwHh8FbS7PN7Zm6b =UN5E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --acGtjEpTl7f57UevJDlS3kJqPqUtuvEVu--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?029a9c1f-de69-3bfd-ff89-1a02feb767a0>