From owner-freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org Sun Jan 20 20:28:09 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-toolchain@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C7F014A4BD9 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 20:28:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2A8380567 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 20:28:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A6F4E14A4BD8; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 20:28:08 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: toolchain@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6943714A4BD6 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 20:28:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03BD780563 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 20:28:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 333931E63B for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 20:28:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x0KKS7Hj079293 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 20:28:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x0KKS735079292 for toolchain@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 20:28:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: toolchain@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 231010] emulators/wine: Segmentation fault when built on 12.0-CURRENT/ALPHA Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2019 20:28:06 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: crash X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: gerald@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: gerald@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: merge-quarterly? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Maintenance of FreeBSD's integrated toolchain List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2019 20:28:09 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D231010 Gerald Pfeifer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Open |In Progress CC| |dbn@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #11 from Gerald Pfeifer --- (In reply to Theron Tarigo from comment #9) > Wine was previously working (partially) with LLVM toolchain, but seeing > as how a change there can break it entirely, it might also be true that > the toolchain is the cause of some of the lesser and otherwise inexplicab= le > failures of WINE that are particular to FreeBSD.=20 Indeed. It's yet another factor/difference that introduces risk in a very complex and hard to duplicate/assess situation. (In reply to Alex S from comment #10) > No, winegcc is just a wrapper. Yes, but GCC appears to be the compiler used by (nearly) all Wine developers and the one used to the commercial Crossover products. So, here is what I'll do: I'll add an option to this port such that the user can choose whether to use GCC or not (in which case it'll be the system compiler). And I'll make the use of GCC the default.=20 That is the conservative option for non-expert users, while giving an option to those who want to avoid GCC - plus an easy way to play with the two compiler choices. (Adding @dbn, who made the original suggestion to go for clang where available back a few years ago, and since he's been more than just helping with things around Wine on FreeBSD over the years.) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=