From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Jul 12 1:29:32 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from dfw-ix2.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix2.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DE1A152B5 for ; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 01:29:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami@cs.berkeley.edu) Received: (from smap@localhost) by dfw-ix2.ix.netcom.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) id DAA10810; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 03:28:56 -0500 (CDT) Received: from sji-ca4-70.ix.netcom.com(205.186.212.198) by dfw-ix2.ix.netcom.com via smap (V1.3) id rma010806; Mon Jul 12 03:28:45 1999 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.6.9) id BAA68257; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 01:28:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 01:28:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199907120828.BAA68257@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> X-Authentication-Warning: silvia.hip.berkeley.edu: asami set sender to asami@cs.berkeley.edu using -f To: handy@lambic.physics.montana.edu Cc: ports@freebsd.org In-reply-to: (message from Brian Handy on Mon, 21 Jun 1999 20:58:53 -0600 (MDT)) Subject: Re: Nuke netscape-*-4.51 From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) References: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * From: Brian Handy * Cc: ports@freebsd.org * * > [I suggested:] * * > * Since the distfiles are gone, I vote to nuke: * > * * > * netscape45-navigator * > * netscape45-communicator * > * >Weren't there some issues on reliability with 4.6? If those are * >resolved, I have no objections against removing the 4.5* versions. * * I'm not sure if they were resolved. I just noted the distfiles weren't on * the MASTER_SITE anymore...so...unless there's another way, I think that * about takes care of it. :-) Any more on this? I've been using 4.61 for almost three weeks now and it doesn't seem less reliabile than 4.51. I think we can delete 4.51. -PW To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message