From owner-freebsd-chromium@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 31 08:21:16 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: chromium@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AE20106564A; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 08:21:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from r.c.ladan@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FCE28FC12; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 08:21:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk35 with SMTP id 35so3628483qyk.13 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 01:21:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=66SKmoM/9ZmOqSN9jsdvML/O6tqUYn7z0IdauQDXHnE=; b=R83CGpakQBWpH3bzpZ9KWlQjM6X+pmck95EXaG5bgHaYR8WONvq8WNYNMRYOsIRL4U g9pSWqHPgZFdVL7uDX88h942Y2Z8pLggb2TTaqTamU0hdSzMX767pBohk3h3mkvI6AZ+ WGhDWNLbDabAhfHUbU0JTyQN6MaRUtAn3pRD4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=IjL8vzNB9AmyYjpkIHR/hkGJcWDCQDdVmPlr3G5sK5NPcGavRBNk1mxcPwfBVG7Nul JjPaKFxHNSjMYRW1K5iIqYWgaTYWMS+TOSJqkaIpyo6Z045AhZC7yTowx9axRseOyJbW yfP1ivGONKjVYXzurKzLHBMcrnwtH9EqwGcjM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.141.13 with SMTP id k13mr1960327qcu.36.1301559675456; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 01:21:15 -0700 (PDT) Sender: r.c.ladan@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.224.20 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 01:21:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4D9239F7.7020204@freebsd.org> <4D941F6B.3040901@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 10:21:15 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5vE9TRbRX6m07a8DiwcgGdMn9jw Message-ID: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Ladan?= To: Baptiste Daroussin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: chromium@freebsd.org Subject: Re: the last mile? X-BeenThere: freebsd-chromium@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Chromium issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 08:21:16 -0000 2011/3/31 Baptiste Daroussin : > 2011/3/31 Rene Ladan : >> Op 29-03-2011 21:58, Rene Ladan schreef: >>> Hi, >>> >>> in its current state chromium-10.0.648.X looks pretty decent IMO. >>> >> [..] >> >>> The biggest todo for chromium-10.0.648.X is to get it render pages on >>> 8.2 and below. I guess someone with a big machine should build a debug >>> image and/or see what's different libthr on 7.4/8.2 versus CURRENT. >>> >> What if we just commit the port _right now_ after marking it BROKEN on >> 7.X/8.X ? =A0In it's current form nobody can really use the version in t= he >> Ports Tree (or they would have to remove the FORBIDDEN line), if we >> commit this version at least some people can. =A0And we might get more >> eyes to look at this timeout bug. >> >> Maybe it's a bad idea... >> > > This can be a good idea, + documenting that it works if launched with > the no thread option. > I'll try the nothread option. We can add a conditional message about it to = the port for 7.X/8.X. Ren=E9