From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Oct 29 15:00:17 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8340A302;
 Tue, 29 Oct 2013 15:00:17 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from feld@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.28])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 570412CC3;
 Tue, 29 Oct 2013 15:00:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.46])
 by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99AB420845;
 Tue, 29 Oct 2013 11:00:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213])
 by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 29 Oct 2013 11:00:10 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:cc:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:references
 :subject:date; s=smtpout; bh=VIhnLRXbxu3eURgqmKOpunl6uOw=; b=HqM
 A3eFZtO4KejUr1C9qdLAnLe9Qwz4ditv4cCR3RtNkWgcH+fX7F9fF8GTW4Qxy45N
 PdBG1rdvCZyMoK1Kkkj5VLNebFK3ydO9/oTL4DuNOev7oY4pWqqxBtaJYGzC+Bdn
 NjFyhWu9WBqafyzco67iJo8Lyi6w6mqJORJA+vIo=
Received: by web3.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99)
 id 72609119C4E; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 11:00:10 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <1383058810.14878.40267333.50100861@webmail.messagingengine.com>
X-Sasl-Enc: lj0JdU6Y6YlDQ1LZ+AbMvq4b9XvhBJT339ZBmMemTygj 1383058810
From: Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org>
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-96010b3f
In-Reply-To: <CA+oAPDavDNmSAb2HX3Ju6RVuXpHhaK-mMxa=-p_e7m4w62C1sw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+oAPDavDNmSAb2HX3Ju6RVuXpHhaK-mMxa=-p_e7m4w62C1sw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: hwpstate0: set freq failed patch
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 10:00:10 -0500
Cc: hiren@freebsd.org, Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 15:00:17 -0000

On Tue, Oct 29, 2013, at 9:27, Claudio Zumbo wrote:
> Hello,
> Would it be possible for this patch to get to 10 before it goes -release?
> 
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2012-May/067758.html
> 
> I've tested it on an amd 6600k and it seems to be working, a quick google
> search shows other people have had good results on different cpus.
> 

I saw you in #bsddev this morning. 

PR in question:

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=167018

CCing hiren@ and avg@ 

I have no idea if this can make it in 10, but we're still in BETA. It
would be nice if powerd worked out of the box on those chips.