From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Apr 16 14:57:29 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA16004
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 14:57:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from perki0.connect.com.au (perki0.connect.com.au [192.189.54.85])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA15935
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 14:57:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nemeton.UUCP (uucp@localhost) by perki0.connect.com.au with UUCP id HAA29901
  (8.8.5/IDA-1.6); Thu, 17 Apr 1997 07:51:00 +1000 (EST)
Received: from localhost.nemeton.com.au (localhost.nemeton.com.au [127.0.0.1])
	by nemeton.com.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id HAA01597;
	Thu, 17 Apr 1997 07:34:30 +1000 (EST)
Message-Id: <199704162134.HAA01597@nemeton.com.au>
To: Pedro Giffuni <pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co>
cc: David Nugent <davidn@unique.usn.blaze.net.au>,
        Warner Losh <imp@village.org>,
        "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: on the subject of changes to -RELEASEs... 
In-reply-to: <33553AE7.23FD@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co> 
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 1997 07:34:30 +1000
From: Giles Lean <giles@nemeton.com.au>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


On Wed, 16 Apr 1997 13:47:35 -0700  Pedro Giffuni wrote:

> No, it shouldn't. Procmail is a local mailer .. a replacement for
> "mail", since smrsh shouldn't go under the local part of the
> sendmail.cf, it should only affect programs that the external mailer
> should invoke;

Pedro,

Many more people call procmail from .forward than have it as their
local mail delivery program so it must be accessible to smrsh.

David's suggestion that the procmail port install to co-operate with
smrsh is a good one, following the principle of least astonishment.

Giles