Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 3 Jan 2013 13:14:29 -0500
From:      Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>
To:        =?UTF-8?Q?Dag=2DErling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
Cc:        arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: BURN_BRIDGES in bsd.own.mk
Message-ID:  <CAF6rxg=ERVyrKdOZCO6AVWchynUD1uRwgb9js1T_SS1UJg4GzQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <86zk0q1czz.fsf@ds4.des.no>
References:  <86zk0q1czz.fsf@ds4.des.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3 January 2013 10:51, Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav <des@des.no> wrote:
> We still have code in bsd.own.mk to support a selection of old-style
> NO_FOO options, protected by .if !defined(BURN_BRIDGES) (which is not in
> any way related to the similarly-named kernel option).  There is also
> bsd.compat.mk, which handles the even older-style NOFOO options (by
> translating them to NO_FOO and emitting a warning).  These chunks of
> code date back to 2006 and 2004, respectively.  I think it's way past
> time we nuked them.  Any objections?

No.  See http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dconf/155738

I've been told this required an exp-run last I asked.


--=20
Eitan Adler



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxg=ERVyrKdOZCO6AVWchynUD1uRwgb9js1T_SS1UJg4GzQ>