From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 13 12:44:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 128681065673; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 12:44:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arundel@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBE478FC0C; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 12:44:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o8DCidpN009140; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 12:44:39 GMT (envelope-from arundel@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from arundel@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o8DCidHT009136; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 12:44:39 GMT (envelope-from arundel) Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 12:44:39 GMT Message-Id: <201009131244.o8DCidHT009136@freefall.freebsd.org> To: vermaden@interia.pl, arundel@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: arundel@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: bin/144649: [request] Inconsistency in naming: mount_msdosfs(8) vs newfs_msdos(8) X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 12:44:40 -0000 Old Synopsis: Inconsistency in naming: mount_msdosfs(8) vs newfs_msdos(8) New Synopsis: [request] Inconsistency in naming: mount_msdosfs(8) vs newfs_msdos(8) State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: arundel State-Changed-When: Mon Sep 13 12:38:32 UTC 2010 State-Changed-Why: Renaming mount_msdosfs to mountfs_msdos would introduce inconsistency with the other mount_* commands. Renaming newfs_msdos to newfs_msdosfs wouldn't make any sence, since having the "fs" keyword twice in it is unneccessary. Thanks for your problem report. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=144649