Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:54:50 -0500 From: Alejandro Imass <aimass@yabarana.com> To: Sean Chittenden <seanc@groupon.com> Cc: jail@freebsd.org, "Michael W. Lucas" <mwlucas@michaelwlucas.com> Subject: Re: preferred jail management tool Message-ID: <CAHieY7TyxzC0aK-ErY2EbCmTJPykk_9G7Gd=CrZ9yxQ-77PynA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CACfj5vKjiQHsy9VbOKFFcrBpyr3dmbkOOxTxCYhSyZrnrjRiaQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CACfj5vKjiQHsy9VbOKFFcrBpyr3dmbkOOxTxCYhSyZrnrjRiaQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Sean Chittenden <seanc@groupon.com> wrote: > Well this is a rather trendy topic of late and timely. I'm very happy to > see a renaissance and renewed interest in container administration for > FreeBSD. > > [...] > For years I've used and endorsed ezjail, but as stated, it is depreciated. > For a book, excluding ezjail would exclude a huge portion of the user base > and seems like it would hurt credibility given its dominance as the > preferred tool for jail administration. > Maybe is something obvious to the more technical crowd but as a user what does "depreciated" mean in this context? If it's "loosing value" how is this determined? by whom? or it being phased-out replaced by other tools? Or is this based on your evaluation? If so can you specify what is specifically missing/outdated/not maintained from EzJail, or is the whole jail system going in a direction to make EzJail and other tools obsolete? Thanks for any clarification! -- Alejandro Imass
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHieY7TyxzC0aK-ErY2EbCmTJPykk_9G7Gd=CrZ9yxQ-77PynA>