From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 12:55:37 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF85716A4CE; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 12:55:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.chesapeake.net (chesapeake.net [208.142.252.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5975E43D45; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 12:55:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Received: from mail.chesapeake.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.chesapeake.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j39Ctaws061765; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 08:55:36 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Received: from localhost (jroberson@localhost)j39CtaEb061762; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 08:55:36 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.chesapeake.net: jroberson owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 08:55:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Jeff Roberson To: Alfred Perlstein In-Reply-To: <20050409125239.GI60345@elvis.mu.org> Message-ID: <20050409085414.M28571@mail.chesapeake.net> References: <200504091204.j39C4aH4033816@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050409125239.GI60345@elvis.mu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org cc: Jeff Roberson cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys namei.h src/sys/kern vfs_syscalls.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 12:55:38 -0000 On Sat, 9 Apr 2005, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Jeff Roberson [050409 05:04] wrote: > > jeff 2005-04-09 12:04:36 UTC > > > > FreeBSD src repository > > > > Modified files: > > sys/sys namei.h > > sys/kern vfs_syscalls.c > > Log: > > - Remove the namei NOOBJ flag. It is meaningless now. > > Please bring this back, it is very useful actually. > > It is the flag that happens to tell the underlying FS if the > vnode is going to be used or not. Basically, if there will > be an attribute fetch or an open. > > (autofs) Nothing presently makes use of it. And the name is misleading if that's what you want to use it for. When someone adds functionality to make use of this in a filesystem we can revive it easily enough with a better name. > > thank you! > > -- > - Alfred Perlstein > - Research Engineering Development Inc. > - email: bright@mu.org cell: 408-480-4684 >