From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 23 07:14:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A5F01065673 for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 07:14:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A7A08FC13 for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 07:14:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p8N7EcjJ084323 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 23 Sep 2011 08:14:39 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk p8N7EcjJ084323 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1316762080; bh=BErDbcWeZ/roep3pOHx8WfoHtrRXhtyJH9SL/sY5jf8=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4E7C31D6.1040404@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20F ri,=2023=20Sep=202011=2008:14:30=20+0100|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0=20(M acintosh=3B=20Intel=20Mac=20OS=20X=2010.6=3B=20rv:6.0.2)=20Gecko/2 0110902=20Thunderbird/6.0.2|MIME-Version:=201.0|To:=20Frank=20Shut e=20|CC:=20Ryan=20Coleman=20,=20=0D=0A=20FreeBSD=20Questions=20|Subject:=20Re:=20much=20to=20my=20surprise....|References :=20<201109222014.p8MKEobt083145@mail.r-bonomi.com>=20<4B62F4A4-4B 49-4CB5-91F1-A3C3E624251F@d3photography.com>=20<20110923000837.GD7 704@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk>|In-Reply-To:=20<20110923000837.G D7704@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk>|X-Enigmail-Version:=201.3.1|Op enPGP:=20id=3D60AE908C|Content-Type:=20multipart/signed=3B=20mical g=3Dpgp-sha1=3B=0D=0A=20protocol=3D"application/pgp-signature"=3B= 0D=0A=20boundary=3D"------------enig6612E4C151A734E585A942F0"; b=UWteR6KCXbZmy0gUATRaPSZipOWi7eAjG/e61u6WKZ8Xc8sKzMZV4qGHfu8rrk2VK xImkRnZapwlhcyyrhllSIUk0+k+Ex5+OJVa49Q0BhoVjChI8gNdwDpXUpocc+IWWnD 3BkxlYAAFiZDi6xIEqUrog+lImi0c0aZ/LRzRbjw= Message-ID: <4E7C31D6.1040404@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 08:14:30 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frank Shute References: <201109222014.p8MKEobt083145@mail.r-bonomi.com> <4B62F4A4-4B49-4CB5-91F1-A3C3E624251F@d3photography.com> <20110923000837.GD7704@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20110923000837.GD7704@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.1 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig6612E4C151A734E585A942F0" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.2 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Ryan Coleman , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: much to my surprise.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 07:14:47 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig6612E4C151A734E585A942F0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 23/09/2011 01:08, Frank Shute wrote: > I had to use them because my static IP all of a sudden became dynamic > (crappy ISP). Now it seems to have gone back to static again. There are much better ISPs in the UK -- usually the smaller ones give you much better service. You can get a /28 fixed block as part of a standard package if you shop around. > I certainly wouldn't consider running my own DNS server (having done > it). It's more trouble than it's worth and is just one more > vulnerability/thing to go wrong. You can just use hosts for a small > network. Not my experience. Running my own DNS is simple and trouble free, plus it gives me much more scope to play with things like DNSSEC. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig6612E4C151A734E585A942F0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEUEARECAAYFAk58Md4ACgkQ8Mjk52CukIzCBgCWIgqvMioLrtEuUXl16VPcGMzm WACeN56WzZiODMqmaxR3X4YvE+NDVRQ= =TM3R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig6612E4C151A734E585A942F0--