From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Dec 24 05:52:41 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21B98525
 for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Wed, 24 Dec 2014 05:52:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [78.47.246.247])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FC5A18E1
 for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Wed, 24 Dec 2014 05:52:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (root@eg.sd.rdtc.ru [62.231.161.221])
 by hz.grosbein.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sBO5qLcU051953
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
 Wed, 24 Dec 2014 06:52:25 +0100 (CET)
 (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net)
X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net
X-Envelope-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eugen@localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sBO5qIOf034617;
 Wed, 24 Dec 2014 12:52:18 +0700 (KRAT)
 (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net)
Message-ID: <549A5492.6000503@grosbein.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2014 12:52:18 +0700
From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?UTF-8?B?RGFnLUVybGluZyBTbcO4cmdyYXY=?= <des@des.no>,
 freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-14:31.ntp
References: <20141223233310.098C54BB6@nine.des.no> <86h9wln9nw.fsf@nine.des.no>
In-Reply-To: <86h9wln9nw.fsf@nine.des.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_Q, 
 LOCAL_FROM autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-Spam-Report: * 2.7 DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_Q Date: is 4 days to 4 months after
 Received: date
 * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 *      [score: 0.0000] *  2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on hz.grosbein.net
X-Spam-Level: **
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]"
 <freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-security>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2014 05:52:41 -0000

On 24.12.2014 08:01, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> FreeBSD Security Advisories <security-advisories@freebsd.org> writes:
>> Corrected:      2014-14-22 19:07:16 UTC (stable/10, 10.1-STABLE)
>>                 2014-14-22 19:08:09 UTC (stable/9, 9.3-STABLE)
>>                 2014-14-22 19:08:09 UTC (stable/8, 8.4-STABLE)
> 
> Sorry about the bogus correction dates, these should of course be
> 2014-12-22.  The dates for the releng branches are correct, and the
> version posted on the web site also has the correct dates.

Why does it say "Recompile the operating system using buildworld and installworld"?
The patch touches contrib/ntp only. It should be enough to rebuild ntpd only, shouldn't it?

Eugene Grosbein