Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 15:01:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> To: Martin Blapp <mb@imp.ch> Cc: Alexander Kabaev <ak03@gte.com>, <current@FreeBSD.org>, <developers@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: HEADS UP: GCC 3.2 in progress Message-ID: <20020901150048.L16984-100000@wonky.feral.com> In-Reply-To: <20020902000044.N12764-100000@levais.imp.ch>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I should note that I'm raising more of a flag than normal. This would have been a firing offense at several companies I've worked at. It's not unreasonable to take a lesson from *why* these things are firing offenses and start to raise queries. I've done so. Duty is done. Go back to sleep. On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Martin Blapp wrote: > > Hi, > > > totally wrong, and this won't break things. I'm just a bit startled that > > this appears out of nowhere (I sure don't recall it being discussed) and > > just happens, with 10 minutes warning. > > The 2.95.3 -> 3.1 prerelease upgrade was a big step. > > 3.1 prerelease -> 3.2 is a little step which fixes bugs, make > kde working (gif support) again, fixes X11 and mozilla ports. > > > I don't mean to be hypercritical here, but I feel that it's fair, > > considering people are starting to really whine about how late 5.0 > > actually *is* at this point, to begin to ask not even the *hard* > > questions, but medium firm questions about "gee, is this trip *really* > > necessary?" > > I think yes. Gcc 3.1 prerelease had some nasty bugs. > > Martin > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020901150048.L16984-100000>